TECHNICAL STUDY ON THE COMPARATIVE PLANNING OF A WASTE COLLECTION VESSEL PROPULSION SYSTEM: CONVENTIONAL ENGINE AND SOLAR PANELS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30649/ijmea.v1i1.374Keywords:
Diesel, propulsion, solar panels, technical comparative analysis, waste collection vesselAbstract
Conventional diesel engines, also known as mechanical direct injection systems, represent a traditional approach to fuel delivery in engines. In contrast, solar panels convert sunlight into electrical energy using the photovoltaic effect. This research aims to conduct a technical comparative study on the planning of a waste collection vessel propulsion system using both conventional diesel engines and solar panels. The vessel system design requires 3.78 hp. The battery capacity calculated for this system is 84.24 Ah, with an operational duration of 6.4 hours for the diesel engine. The waste capacity is 0.371 m³/ton, with a power requirement of 3.75 hp, and the chosen engine for this setup is the Yamaha 5CHMS. For the solar panel system, the potential calculation is 5.47 hours of sunlight, with a similar vessel system design of 3.78 hp. The battery usage duration is 6 hours, with the same waste capacity and power requirement. The selected solar panel is the Hangkai DNYSJYSJ. Based on technical calculations, it can be concluded that a waste collection vessel with a conventional diesel engine is more efficient due to its consistent technical performance requirements.
Downloads
References
J. F. Hansen and F. Wendt, “History and State of the Art in Commercial Electric Ship Propulsion, Integrated Power Systems, and Future Trends,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 103, no. 12, pp. 2229–2242, Dec. 2015, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2015.2458990.
E. Sugianto, J. H. Chen, and N. P. Purba, “Cleaning technology for marine debris: A review of current status and evaluation,” International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology 2022, pp. 1–20, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1007/S13762-022-04373-8.
G. Duan and K. Zhang, “Optimization on hybrid energy vessel routing and energy management for floating marine debris cleanup,” Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol, vol. 138, p. 103649, May 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.TRC.2022.103649.
M. Compa, D. March, and S. Deudero, “Spatio-temporal monitoring of coastal floating marine debris in the Balearic Islands from sea-cleaning boats,” Mar Pollut Bull, vol. 141, pp. 205–214, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.MARPOLBUL.2019.02.027.
A. Del Pizzo, R. M. Polito, R. Rizzo, and P. Tricoli, “Design criteria of on-board propulsion for hybrid electric boats,” 19th International Conference on Electrical Machines, ICEM 2010, 2010, doi: 10.1109/ICELMACH.2010.5607817.
B. Jeong, E. Oguz, H. Wang, and P. Zhou, “Multi-criteria decision-making for marine propulsion: Hybrid, diesel electric and diesel mechanical systems from cost-environment-risk perspectives,” Appl Energy, vol. 230, pp. 1065–1081, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2018.09.074.
C. A. Reusser and J. R. Pérez Osses, “Challenges for Zero-Emissions Ship,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2021, Vol. 9, Page 1042, vol. 9, no. 10, p. 1042, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.3390/JMSE9101042.
H. Lan, S. Wen, Y. Y. Hong, D. C. Yu, and L. Zhang, “Optimal sizing of hybrid PV/diesel/battery in ship power system,” Appl Energy, vol. 158, pp. 26–34, Nov. 2015, doi: 10.1016/J.APENERGY.2015.08.031.
G. de Freitas Viscondi and S. N. Alves-Souza, “A Systematic Literature Review on big data for solar photovoltaic electricity generation forecasting,” Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, vol. 31, pp. 54–63, Feb. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.seta.2018.11.008.
C. S. Chin, Y. J. Tan, and M. V. Kumar, “Study of Hybrid Propulsion Systems for Lower Emissions and Fuel Saving on Merchant Ship during Voyage,” Journal of Marine Science and Engineering 2022, Vol. 10, Page 393, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 393, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.3390/JMSE10030393.
H. Pestana, “Future trends of electrical propulsion and implications to ship design,” Maritime Technology and Engineering, pp. 811–820, Sep. 2014, doi: 10.1201/B17494-85.
E. Sugianto, J. H. Chen, and N. V. A. Permadi, “Effect of Monohull Type and Catamaran Hull Type on Ocean Waste Collection Behavior Using OpenFOAM,” Water 2022, Vol. 14, Page 2623, vol. 14, no. 17, p. 2623, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/W14172623.
N. Planakis, G. Papalambrou, and N. Kyrtatos, “Predictive power-split system of hybrid ship propulsion for energy management and emissions reduction,” Control Eng Pract, vol. 111, p. 104795, Jun. 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.CONENGPRAC.2021.104795.
A. Iswantoro, I. M. Ariana, and M. Syuhri, “Analysis of Performance, Emission, Noise and Vibration on Single Cylinder Diesel Engine After Installing Dual Fuel Converter-Kit Based on ECU,” Kapal: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan dan Teknologi Kelautan, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 42–49, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.14710/KAPAL.V19I1.44126.
N. Bennabi, J. F. Charpentier, H. Menana, J. Y. Billard, and P. Genet, “Hybrid propulsion systems for small ships: Context and challenges,” Proceedings - 2016 22nd International Conference on Electrical Machines, ICEM 2016, pp. 2948–2954, Nov. 2016, doi: 10.1109/ICELMACH.2016.7732943.
C. Nuchturee, T. Li, and H. Xia, “Energy efficiency of integrated electric propulsion for ships – A review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 134, p. 110145, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110145.
W. Litwin, W. Lesniewski, D. Piatek, and K. Niklas, “Experimental Research on the Energy Efficiency of a Parallel Hybrid Drive for an Inland Ship,” Energies 2019, Vol. 12, Page 1675, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1675, May 2019, doi: 10.3390/EN12091675.
B. Jeong et al., “Is electric battery propulsion for ships truly the lifecycle energy solution for marine environmental protection as a whole?,” J Clean Prod, vol. 355, p. 131756, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.1016/J.JCLEPRO.2022.131756.
M. Altosole, U. Campora, and V. Vigna, “Energy efficiency analysis of a flexible marine hybrid propulsion system,” 2020 International Symposium on Power Electronics, Electrical Drives, Automation and Motion, SPEEDAM 2020, pp. 436–441, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1109/SPEEDAM48782.2020.9161873.
E. K. Dedes, D. A. Hudson, and S. R. Turnock, “Assessing the potential of hybrid energy technology to reduce exhaust emissions from global shipping,” Energy Policy, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 204–218, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/J.ENPOL.2011.09.046.
H. Doukas, E. Spiliotis, M. A. Jafari, S. Giarola, and A. Nikas, “Low-cost emissions cuts in container shipping: Thinking inside the box,” Transp Res D Transp Environ, vol. 94, p. 102815, May 2021, doi: 10.1016/J.TRD.2021.102815.
Y. Yuan, J. Wang, X. Yan, B. Shen, and T. Long, “A review of multi-energy hybrid power system for ships,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 132, p. 110081, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.RSER.2020.110081.
P. Wu and R. Bucknall, “Hybrid fuel cell and battery propulsion system modelling and multi-objective optimisation for a coastal ferry,” Int J Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 4, pp. 3193–3208, Jan. 2020, doi: 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2019.11.152.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Marine Engineering and Applications
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
